Jump to content

Welcome to 205GTIDrivers.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
 
 

Photo

Insurance Companies


  • Please log in to reply
167 replies to this topic

#1
Natasha

Natasha
  • Veterans+
  • 1,070 posts
Joined: 28 Nov 2002
  • Location:Somerset
Please find below details of insurance companies. This list has been generated using comments made by forum users.

I am sure this isnt a conclusive list so if you have any further suggestions please reply to this post where our friendly moderation team will update the original post accordingly (and sticky?!).

So this doesn't turn into a really long thread about quotes and experiences, please could you refrain from discussion and just insert the companies details. At the end of the day each company will be different for everybody!

Confused - http://www.confused.com/ - Please note confused is not an insurance company it is just an effective search engine.

AA - http://www.theaa.com
Admiral - http://www.admiral.com
Adrian Flux - http://www.adrianflux.co.uk/
Asda Car Insurance - http://www.asdafinance.com
Barclays Car Insurance - https://www.barclays...insurance.co.uk
Bell - http://www.bell.co.uk
Carole Nash - http://www.carolenash.com/
Churchill - http://www.churchill.com/
CIS - http://www.cis.co.uk
Diamond Womens Insurance - http://www.diamond.co.uk/
Direct Line - http://www.directlin...tor/welcome.htm
Elephant http://www.elephant.co.uk
Endsleigh - http://www.endsleigh.co.uk/
Esure - http://www.esure.com
Firebond - https://www.firebond.co.uk/
First Alternative - http://www.firstalternative.com/
Greenlight Insurance - http://www.greenlightinsurance.com - 08707 53 54 55 Forum Discount of 5%-15%
Herts Insurance (HIC) - http://www.hertsinsurance.com - 08451 290 290 Forum discount of up to 20%
Its 4 Me - http://www.its4me.co.uk/
Kwik-Fit Car Insurance - http://www.kwik-fitinsurance.com/
Liverpool Victoria - http://www.liverpoolvictoria.co.uk
More Than - http://www.morethan.com
Norwich Union - http://www.norwichunion.com
RAC - http://www.rac.co.uk
Tesco Car Insurance - http://www.tescofinance.com
Virgin - http://uk.virginmone.../car-insurance/

Edited by cybernck, 17 November 2012 - 02:24 AM.


#2
pug_ham

pug_ham
  • Team Managers
  • 18,423 posts
Joined: 27 Nov 2002
  • Name:Graham
  • Location:Near Skipton, North Yorkshire
Garage View Garage
Here are a couple I've previously used for my GTi insurance that offer an agreed value & limited mileage policy;

www.heritage-quote.co.uk cover also includes breakdown recovery & show cover iirc.

My current insurance is with;
www.peterbestinsurance.co.uk offering the same type of policy as heritage but they were cheaper for me, less than 200 when I took the policy out.

Graham.

#3
miamistu

miamistu
  • Drivers
  • 1,152 posts
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
  • Location:Farnham, Surrey
Would it be possible to note which companies deal with mods?

#4
pug_ham

pug_ham
  • Team Managers
  • 18,423 posts
Joined: 27 Nov 2002
  • Name:Graham
  • Location:Near Skipton, North Yorkshire
Garage View Garage

Both that I've used support mods & of the others I'm fairly certain that the rest listed below do;

Some of the others might but I don't know which.

Graham.



#5
miamistu

miamistu
  • Drivers
  • 1,152 posts
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
  • Location:Farnham, Surrey
Cheers Graham :)

#6
richard

richard
  • Veterans+
  • 1,772 posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
  • Name:Richard
  • Location:nr Chelmsford, Essex
HIC insure cars with mods, allowed up to 10% increase in power before you then have to provide proof of your engine output, premium will be adjusted accordingly.

Also have no issues with putting a cage in.

#7
Rom

Rom
  • Drivers
  • 998 posts
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
  • Location:Bristol
Might sound silly, but im with Vauxhall. Remnants from my nova days :blush:
I pay something like 450 fully comp on a 1.9 Cat 1 on a drive 4 years NCB.

#8
AndyUoh

AndyUoh
  • Drivers
  • 55 posts
Joined: 12 Jul 2006
  • Location:Winchester / Hatfield
I used confused dot coms online search thingy, which gave me quinn insurance. Its about 700 a year TPFT, but I am 20 with one year no claims. And i have cover on other vehicles and europe. It suits me quite well. Thats on a 1.6. If that helps anyone

Andy

#9
TonyGTI

TonyGTI
  • Drivers
  • 132 posts
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
  • Location:North Yorkshire
I recently read a thread of the Lotus 7 club forum which gave me cause for concern

http://www.blatchat....8&pn=1&ps=15&c=


I thought if you had an accident on track then that was just unfortunate for all parties but it seems if you are involved in an accident then there is potential liability.

It would seem that even if you had trackday insurance it only covers you for damage to your own car.

Imagine if a guy in a Porsche hit the brakes excessively hard and you run up the back of him you could cause several thousand pounds worth of damage and be liable?

Anyone with insurance/legal knowledge prepared to comment?

Tony

Sorry about typo's in header - how do you change these in the edit mode?

Edited by TonyGTI, 04 September 2006 - 10:49 AM.


#10
holemi

holemi
  • Drivers
  • 169 posts
Joined: 24 Oct 2004
  • Location:Manchester, England
interesting thread :) .. , more cases like that and they will no doubt make insurance compulsary :lol: which may kill track days as we now know them :)

Edited by holemi, 04 September 2006 - 10:45 AM.


#11
Jonmurgie

Jonmurgie
  • Veterans
  • 5,307 posts
Joined: 04 Jan 2004
  • Location:Cheltenham, Glos
Yeah, that was interesting... I can see the point though that once on track it's each to their own and there can be NO legal liability but in the pitlane is an interesting one, though you would assume any damage to be slight as your not sposed to go very fast in there!

The example you give there Tony would be a case of Tough Luck for the Porsche driver assuming you mean on track... he's taking his car on track with the risk that something may happen etc.

#12
notamondayfan

notamondayfan
  • Drivers
  • 753 posts
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
  • Location:Huddersfield & Wensleydale
kinda puts people off track days hearing stuff like this. shame :)

#13
TonyGTI

TonyGTI
  • Drivers
  • 132 posts
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
  • Location:North Yorkshire

Yeah, that was interesting... I can see the point though that once on track it's each to their own and there can be NO legal liability but in the pitlane is an interesting one, though you would assume any damage to be slight as your not sposed to go very fast in there!

The example you give there Tony would be a case of Tough Luck for the Porsche driver assuming you mean on track... he's taking his car on track with the risk that something may happen etc.



Jon,

This is my concern, I am not sure now it is 'tough luck'. A posting on the & club thread by one of guys I believe has a legal background I quote his statement;

There is some widespread misconception that trackdays operate in a parallel universe where the law does not apply.They don't , nor should they.Those taking part accept a degree of inherent risk which is why most people regard the odd unpleasantness as going with the territory- I know that I do.But let's suppose your car is involved in a shunt and you ,or your passenger is seriously injured.and suppose that the cause is a car driven by a complete idiot who shunts you out of the way whilst you are braking for a corner, or who braketests you as you are about to overtake.Should he be able to say- 'trackday , mate, no rules apply'.Of course not


I would be interesting to hear from the circuit racers out there as to the legal position when they have a coming together I understood that to be all part of the risk.

Tony

#14
Jonmurgie

Jonmurgie
  • Veterans
  • 5,307 posts
Joined: 04 Jan 2004
  • Location:Cheltenham, Glos
Well do you see law suits flying around for those crahses etc. in motorsport races.. NO, so as far as I can see it's the same on a trackday... out on track it's your own problem :)

#15
Batfink

Batfink
  • Drivers
  • 4,802 posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
  • Name:Kev Self
  • Location:Aylesbury!
not quite true Jon. Theres been a few threats of legal ation in the BTCC due to crashes

#16
hengti

hengti
  • Veterans
  • 2,155 posts
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
disconcerting

i guess that, with the ever increasing popularity of track days and the fact that owners of expensive machinery choose to take the risk without taking out adequate insurance cover (regardless of whether or not adequate cover is actually available), we're going to see an increase in these type of 'where there's blame, there's a claim' type of actions.

i've seen a few two car smashes on track days; never a good thing, but participants are taking an inherant risk - to me, this type of thing just proves that some people participate without accepting those risks.

the pitlane incident in the example is a weird one, and the point about holding idiots up to account is very interesting, but I still think it'd be a real shame if this kind of problem led to anything.

#17
boombang

boombang
  • Drivers
  • 2,345 posts
Joined: 13 Mar 2004
  • Location:Essex
Its true that circuits / pitlane / car park at circuit etc all are still covered by UK law.

This means that of course if anyone is NEGLIGENT and causes damages then you can sue them exactly the same as you would if on the road, in a carpark or on your land.

Anyone saying that its always down to you is wrong - if you have proof of fault then its a (not so maybe?) simple legal case.

#18
TonyGTI

TonyGTI
  • Drivers
  • 132 posts
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
  • Location:North Yorkshire

Its true that circuits / pitlane / car park at circuit etc all are still covered by UK law.

This means that of course if anyone is NEGLIGENT and causes damages then you can sue them exactly the same as you would if on the road, in a carpark or on your land.

Anyone saying that its always down to you is wrong - if you have proof of fault then its a (not so maybe?) simple legal case.


Hmmm.


Definition of negligence

negligence n. failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action which such a reasonable person would not. Negligence is accidental as distinguished from "intentional torts" (assault or trespass, for example) or from crimes, but a crime can also constitute negligence, such as reckless driving. Negligence can result in all types of accidents causing physical and/or property damage, but can also include business errors and miscalculations, such as a sloppy land survey. In making a claim for damages based on an allegation of another's negligence, the injured party (plaintiff) must prove: a) that the party alleged to be negligent had a duty to the injured party---specifically to the one injured or to the general public, b ) that the defendant's action (or failure to act) was negligent---not what a reasonably prudent person would have done, c) that the damages were caused ("proximately caused") by the negligence


On a track what constitutes reckless driving??


Tony

on a lighter note my 100th post!!

Edited by TonyGTI, 04 September 2006 - 12:09 PM.


#19
boombang

boombang
  • Drivers
  • 2,345 posts
Joined: 13 Mar 2004
  • Location:Essex
Everyone on track IMHO has a duty to the others out there. You are all using the circuit and nobody wants to crash on track or hit anyone else so thats pretty clear.

If for example a car is badly prepared, a wheel falls off and that causes it to strike another car, there is a clear case of negligence.

If a car is following one very closely and hits them in the rear there is little excuse - its a track day not a race so no reason to be so close. Their DUTY is to not drive in a way that can cause damage/injury/loss to you!

Its a cheesy saying in the personal injury world but very true - where there is a blame there is a claim.


There are obviously a lot less clear cut ones - one car follows another closely and a wheel falls off on the first causes an accident. Well the first is negligent for failing to tighten the wheel correctly but the second shouldn't have been so close! Tough one to call :)

#20
TonyGTI

TonyGTI
  • Drivers
  • 132 posts
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
  • Location:North Yorkshire

Everyone on track IMHO has a duty to the others out there. You are all using the circuit and nobody wants to crash on track or hit anyone else so thats pretty clear.

If for example a car is badly prepared, a wheel falls off and that causes it to strike another car, there is a clear case of negligence.

If a car is following one very closely and hits them in the rear there is little excuse - its a track day not a race so no reason to be so close. Their DUTY is to not drive in a way that can cause damage/injury/loss to you!

Its a cheesy saying in the personal injury world but very true - where there is a blame there is a claim.
There are obviously a lot less clear cut ones - one car follows another closely and a wheel falls off on the first causes an accident. Well the first is negligent for failing to tighten the wheel correctly but the second shouldn't have been so close! Tough one to call :D



So if my brakes fail and I ram a car up the back I'm f***ed (a non legal term) as I will be considerered negligent tbecause I failed to maintain my braking system.